highly significantp < 0.001
When the percentage of regenerated areas was compared, the difference was also highly significant ( p < 0.001).
When the percentage of regenerated areas was compared, the difference was also highly significant ( p < 0.001).
The differences between the groups with biomaterials (T, M, PC) did not reach statistical significance, while the three groups differed statistically significantly from the NC ( p = 0.004; NC vs.