showed a trendP =0.01
However, at subsequent time points, the MBF showed a trend to reduce significantly, where the flows were 0.89±0.14, 0.73±0.13, and 0.59±0.13 at the 165‐, 195‐, and 225‐minute time points, respectively ( P =0.01; Figure 2 ).
However, at subsequent time points, the MBF showed a trend to reduce significantly, where the flows were 0.89±0.14, 0.73±0.13, and 0.59±0.13 at the 165‐, 195‐, and 225‐minute time points, respectively ( P =0.01; Figure 2 ).
In contrast, when comparing angio‐IMR to MBF using data from the 105‐ and 225‐minute time points, angio‐IMR showed a moderate negative correlation to MBF ( r =−0.46; Figure 3E ), and this relationship was borderline significant ( P =0.046).
Median angiography‐derived index of microcirculatory resistance values showed a nonsignificant trend of reduced final microvascular resistance in the SSO 2 group only.