Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in elderly patients: Is age just a number or something more?

World J Gastroenterol · 2025 · PMC12476686 · PMID 41025009

Europe PMCDOI
3
hedged sentences
0.0620
closest p · 1.2× alpha
0.1020
boldest claim

The sentences

marginally non-significantP = 0.062so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
The rate of pancreatitis was higher when the pancreatic duct was catheterized two or more times, although this difference was marginally non-significant statistically (5.4% vs 2.5%; P = 0.062).

also in 593 other papers

did not reach statistical significanceP = 0.102not close (p > 0.1)
Post-ERCP cholecystitis was more frequently observed in patients who had a stent placed (8/721, 1.1% vs 7/1463, 0.7%), although this difference did not reach statistical significance ( P = 0.102).

also in 53,799 other papers

a numerical trendno p-value reported
Our findings echo this, with no statistically significant difference in mortality, although a numerical trend was noted.

also in 536 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.