Those having a two-stage revision, which is most likely to be for infection, showed a trend towards an increased risk of re-revision; however, this was not statistically significant when accounting for other factors (HR 1.59 1.13-2.23 P = .07).
← all excerpts
Re-revision following revision of a failed primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: an analysis of the National Joint Registry and Hospital Episode Statistics for England.
1
—
—