The distribution analysis by cerclage indication is presented in Table 5 , which revealed a numerically higher rate in the prophylactic group (12.8%, n = 5) compared to the ultrasound-based group (4.8%, n = 3) and rescue group (7.7%, n = 3), though this difference did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.410).
← all excerpts
Effect of cervical cerclage on uterine artery doppler parameters and small for gestational age births.
1
0.4100
0.4100