Similarly, the ARPP group exhibited greater maximal load-to-failure (2,092.56 ± 305.16 N; 95% CI: 1,334.5–2,850.6) compared with the EADHP group (907.03 ± 56.48 N; 95% CI: 766.7–1,047.3), but this difference also did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.100, Mann–Whitney U, Cohen’s d = 5.40, BF10 = 696; Table 1 ).
← all excerpts
Biomechanical comparison of the anterior reverse PHILOS and locking compression plate extra-articular distal humerus plates for extra-articular distal humeral fractures.
1
0.1000
0.1000