Survivors were also more likely to be male (55.7% vs 44.3%, P = 0.189) and treated at high (>25 ECLS runs/year) volume centers compared to low (≤10 ECLS runs/year) volume centers (36.4% vs 31.3%, P = 0.282), although these 2 associations did not reach statistical significance ( Table 2 ).
← all excerpts
Optimal ECLS Support in Mixed Cardiogenic and Septic Shock: An ELSO Registry Analysis.
1
—
—