Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of a Non-Weight-Centric Approach to Obesity Prevention in Rural and Urban Female Adolescents: Quasi-Experimental Study.

Interact J Med Res · 2025 · PMC12543216 · PMID 41124631

3
hedged sentences
0.0600
closest p · 1.2× alpha
0.0600
boldest claim

The sentences

marginally nonsignificantP =.06so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
Furthermore, when this effectiveness was examined based on school type, it was found that in urban schools, the intervention (Green Apple) group showed marginally nonsignificant improvement at postintervention, with an adjusted mean difference of 1.86 (95% CI –0.08 to 3.81; P =.06), and nonsignificant improvement at follow-up, with an adjusted mean difference of 1.22 (95% CI –0.82 to 3.25; P =.44).

also in 126 other papers

a possible trendno p-value reported
The direction of the difference at follow-up favored the enhanced intervention (Green Apple+MNCD) group (mean difference 0.73, SE 0.49, 95% CI –0.24 to 1.71), suggesting a possible trend that may warrant further investigation in larger or longer-duration trials.

also in 510 other papers

For instance, in the intervention (Green Apple) group, the overall mean difference from baseline to follow-up across all schools was –0.26 (95% CI –0.67 to 0.14; P =.35), suggesting a modest improvement in body image perception that did not reach statistical significance.

also in 39,124 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.