Consistent performance between medical experts and non-expert readers in forced-choice lesion-detection tasks with PET images.

Med Phys · 2025 · PMC12546698 · PMID 41126367

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentence

0.0700

closest p · 1.4× alpha

0.0700

boldest claim

The sentences

only marginally significantp = 0.07so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Analysis of variance found that reader expertise was only marginally significant ( p = 0.07) and all interactions involving expertise were non‐significant ( p > 0.2).

also in 5,072 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.