close to significancep = 0.062
In the case of DHA, this happened because the negative (advantageous) direct effect was counterbalanced by a positive (disadvantageous but non-significant) indirect effect; in the case of EPA, the indirect effect was too small, and no direct effect emerged at all (although the total effect for EPA was close to significance, p = 0.062) (see Figure 6 and Table 7 ).