A similar trend emerged in the L1–L2 context at marginal significance ( b = −0.011, t = −1.93, p = 0.057, R 2 = 0.05), while no significant relationship was observed in the L2–L3 context ( b = −0.009, t = −1.55, p = 0.127, R 2 = 0.03).
Conversely, in the L1–L3 context, a marginally significant opposite pattern emerged ( b = −0.119, t = −1.86, p = 0.068, R 2 = 0.04), where enhanced inhibitory control was associated with faster “no” response rates.
regions (T7/CP3/P7), alongside decreased activity in right temporal, right temporo-parietal junction, and right inferior parietal areas (T8/TP8/P8; Figure 10 B), while a trend toward increased activity in left inferior parietal regions (P7) was observed for L1–L3 versus L1–L2 contexts, though this did not reach statistical significance ( Figure 10 B).