borderline significancep = 0.060
After adjustment, the risk further decreased to 11-fold (1/0.088) lower, with borderline significance ( p = 0.060).
After adjustment, the risk further decreased to 11-fold (1/0.088) lower, with borderline significance ( p = 0.060).
Additionally, when vitamin D status was classified into three groups (severe deficiency, deficiency, and non-deficiency), the non-deficiency group had a significantly lower HWP risk than the severe deficiency group, with a significant trend indicating decreasing risk as vitamin D levels increased ( p for trend = 0.015) ( S3 Table ).
Sensitivity analyses confirmed a significantly lower HWP risk in the non-deficiency group under the lowered TG criterion and also showed that, in the three-category classification of vitamin D status, the non-deficiency group had a significantly lower HWP risk than the severe deficiency group, with a decreasing trend as vitamin D levels increased.