marginally significantp =0.052
The indirect effect via attention was significant (β=-0.16, 95% confidence interval; CI [-0.40, -0.02], p =0.034), making the direct effect marginally significant (β=-0.28, 95% CI [-0.60, 0.00], p =0.052).
The indirect effect via attention was significant (β=-0.16, 95% confidence interval; CI [-0.40, -0.02], p =0.034), making the direct effect marginally significant (β=-0.28, 95% CI [-0.60, 0.00], p =0.052).
PIGD scores (β=0.31, p =0.062) showed a trend-level association ( Table 3 ).