analysed 204 patients with LPM and found that the risk of pericardial effusion was approximately twice that of traditional pacemakers, although this difference did not reach statistical significance, representing a non-significant trend. 31 Some studies have also found a higher incidence of pericarditis and pericardial effusion, which are similar to our results. 17 , 24 , 32 Regarding device-related complications, our study found that LPM recipients experienced lower rates of device revisions, implant-site issues, and device-related infections, whereas TV-VVI recipients experienced more complications, most of which were lead- or pocket-related.
← all excerpts
Comparison of readmission outcomes and complications between leadless and traditional transvenous pacemakers in older adults: a nationwide readmission analysis of 49852 admission events.
1
—
—