Divergent selection and the evolution of signal traits and mating preferences.

PLoS Biol · 2005 · PMC1262626 · PMID 16231971

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0001

closest p · 0.0× alpha

0.0540

boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp < 0.0001actually significant

The addition of all nonlinear sexual selection was also highly significant overall in each of the 12 populations ( p < 0.0001 in all cases), and the combination of linear and nonlinear selection explained 38%–68% (mean 56%) of the variance in male mating success ( Table 2 ).

also in 132,142 other papers

approached significancep = 0.054so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

This variation approached significance for linear selection (partial F -test, p = 0.054; Table 3 ) and accounted for at least 17.4% of the among-population variation in linear selection.

also in 8,237 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.