marginal significancep = 0.045
In addition, main effects of stimulation type emerged as a marginal significance on ODD, f = 3.27, p = 0.045, η 2 = 0.10, while revealing no statistical difference between each two groups, all p s ≥ 0.077.
In addition, main effects of stimulation type emerged as a marginal significance on ODD, f = 3.27, p = 0.045, η 2 = 0.10, while revealing no statistical difference between each two groups, all p s ≥ 0.077.
The interaction effect of stimulation status × type appeared borderline significance in ODD, f = 3.10, p = 0.057, η 2 = 0.09.
Although there was an increase in performance after stimulation in two of the three evaluation metrics, these improvements did not reach statistical significance when compared to the sham condition.