marginally significantp < 0.0476
Differences in practicality were marginally significant when adjusting for ties (χ 2 = 6.091, df = 2, p < 0.0476), suggesting that Gemini may also have an advantage in this aspect.
Differences in practicality were marginally significant when adjusting for ties (χ 2 = 6.091, df = 2, p < 0.0476), suggesting that Gemini may also have an advantage in this aspect.
Practicality showed marginal significance, with GPT-4 slightly outperforming Gemini ( p = 0.0476).
Although GPT-4 appeared to provide less personalized responses compared with Gemini, this difference did not reach statistical significance (z = −2.0416, p = 0.0618).