Although the CAF + AM group (test group 2) demonstrated clinical improvements comparable to the other two groups across all parameters, including PPD, CAL, RD, KTW, and GT, the differences did not reach statistical significance ( P > 0.05), suggesting a positive trend without conclusive evidence of superiority.
← all excerpts
Unveiling the best: A comparative analysis of three grafted materials for root coverage - A randomized controlled clinical trial.
1
—
—