Examination of the role of dispositional and state suspicion in deceptive ratings and veracity judgments.

Curr Issues Personal Psychol · 2025 · PMC12690355 · PMID 41384006

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0680

closest p · 1.4× alpha

0.0680

boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantp = .068so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The main effect of GCS was marginally significant (∆ R 2 = .01, β = –.12, Z = –1.83, p = .068), suggesting that participants with higher GCS watched fewer videos than those with lower GCS.

also in 26,082 other papers

a clear trendno p-value reported

Although not statistically significant, there was a clear trend that the effect of dispositional suspicion was evident only under low-state suspicion.

also in 19,460 other papers

borderline significantno p-value reported

The results revealed a borderline significant relationship in which individuals with high dispositional suspicion gathered less information before reaching final truth-lie judgments.

also in 11,409 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.