Significant differences were also noted between Group I and Group II (p = 0.002), Group I and Group III (p = 0.041), Group II and Group III (p = 0.013), and Group III and Group IV (p = 0.022). However, the comparison between Group I and Group IV did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.058), suggesting comparable efficacy between heated NaOCl alone and the combined irrigant, though the latter showed slightly better numerical outcomes.
← all excerpts
Comparative evaluation of root canal irrigants against <i>enterococcus faecalis</i>.
1
0.0580
0.0580