nearly significantP = .060
When examining any asymmetry on a single participant level (difference between the two directions using RSDT) compared to controls, only one controls showed a significant asymmetry in proportion of saccades relative to the control group (US: t (9) = 3.16, P = .012), while 12/14 patients did (all P = .05, with an additional patient nearly significant [OC: t (10) = 2.12, P = .060]).