However, it is crucial to note that this difference did not reach statistical significance in major bleeding events [11.1% and 8.9% (risk difference, 2.2 percentage points; 95% CI, −1.8 to 6.3)], suggesting that the observed trend may be influenced by study's limitation and biases rather than a definitive difference in risk.
← all excerpts
Continued Versus Interrupted Oral Anticoagulation During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis.
1
—
—