showed a trendp = 0.07
In the treated‐untreated comparison, the treated group showed a trend toward slower increases in CDR‐SB scores post‐treatment (ΔT=‐1.8, p = 0.07) compared to the untreated group (Figure 2).
In the treated‐untreated comparison, the treated group showed a trend toward slower increases in CDR‐SB scores post‐treatment (ΔT=‐1.8, p = 0.07) compared to the untreated group (Figure 2).