marginally statistically significantp = 0.050
The model explained 5.5% of the variance in PS in relation to the team leader (Adjusted R 2 = 0.055), but the variance was marginally statistically significant ( F (4.97) = 2.469, p = 0.050). 6.
The model explained 5.5% of the variance in PS in relation to the team leader (Adjusted R 2 = 0.055), but the variance was marginally statistically significant ( F (4.97) = 2.469, p = 0.050). 6.
Total work experience, however, approached nearly statistically significant negative association with colleagues ( B = −0.049, p = 0.053).
However, higher work experience showed a marginally significant negative association with PS in relation to colleagues.