trending towards significanceP = 0.06
Specifically, stronger inhibitory CPM effect was correlated with lower PAF in the right dlPFC (Spearman r = 0.33, P = 0.04) and sgACC (Pearson r = 0.34, P = 0.03) in the whole group (see Table 3, supplemental digital content, http://links.lww.com/PAIN/C381 ), and similarly stronger inhibitory CPM effect in males was correlated with lower PAF in the right dlPFC (Pearson r = 0.58 P = 0.01) and trending towards significance in the sgACC (Pearson r = 0.47, P = 0.06) (see Fig. 10, supplemental digital content, http://links.lww.com/PAIN/C381 ).