In subgroup analysis, the effect was mainly driven by observational studies (IRR = 0.37, 95% CI 0.27-0.50; P < .001), whereas the RCT subgroup did not reach statistical significance (IRR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.38-1.14; P = .14) ( Figure 1 ).
← all excerpts
Surgical vs Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis- an Updated Meta-Analysis of Reconstructed Individual Patient Data.
2
0.1400
0.1800
The sentences
a nonsignificant trendP = .18
This effect was predominantly derived from observational studies (IRR = 0.37, 95% CI 0.21-0.66; P < .01), while the RCT subgroup showed a nonsignificant trend (IRR = 0.63, 95% CI 0.32-1.24; P = .18) ( Figure 2A ).