0.835; ΔC-index, 0.011; P = 0.035; NRI: − 0.8%, P = 0.811; IDI: 0.001, P = 0.812), which was highly attributable to the model improvement among males, which almost reached statistical significance in C-index increase and NRI but not IDI statistics (C-index: 0.835 vs. 0.823; ΔC-index, 0.012; P = 0.078; NRI: 9.8%, P = 0.086; IDI: − 0.005, P = 0.792).
← all excerpts
Improved sex-specific cardiovascular risk prediction with multi-omics data in people with type 2 diabetes.
2
0.0780
0.0780
The sentences
In women, the marginal improvements in model accuracy did not reach statistical significance in our study, which suggests that a protein-extended SCORE2-Diabetes model is sufficient for MACE risk assessment in women with T2D.