However, the wide confidence intervals that consistently encompassed the zero-effect line indicate that human disturbance only had limited explanatory power for its activity and did not reach statistical significance ( Figure 12 a).
← all excerpts
Response Strategies of Giant Panda, Red Panda, and Forest Musk Deer to Human Disturbance in Sichuan Liziping National Nature Reserve.
4
—
—
The sentences
On a monthly scale, this study found that the relative abundance of walking and livestock disturbances peaked from November to December, coinciding with an increasing trend in the relative abundance of giant panda, red panda, and forest musk deer.
owed aggregated distribution, and forest musk deer exhibited a multi-core distribution, with the core distribution areas of each species spatially segregated from high-disturbance zones; (4) GAM analysis revealed that the red panda responded most significantly to disturbance, the giant panda showed marginal significance, and the forest musk deer showed no significant response.
The GAM analysis revealed that the disturbance response was strongest in red pandas, marginally significant in giant pandas, and non-significant in forest musk deer.