Barely Significant
← all excerpts

The Accuracy of Maxillary Canines' Rotation with Different Attachment Designs: A Retrospective Study.

J Clin Med · 2026 · PMC12842249 · PMID 41598570

3
hedged sentences
0.0500
closest p · 1.0× alpha
0.0900
boldest claim

The sentences

borderline significancep = 0.05actually significant
Based on these findings, the null hypothesis—stating that attachment orientation does not affect the rotational accuracy—cannot be fully rejected in the overall model, the findings should be interpreted as indicative of a trend toward improved rotational control with oblique crescent-shaped attachments rather than definitive superiority, given the borderline significance ( p = 0.05) and the moderate effect size (d = 0.5) observed.

also in 7,017 other papers

borderline significantp = 0.05actually significant
The pairwise comparison between the vertical and oblique groups yielded a borderline significant p -value ( p = 0.05) accompanied by a moderate effect size (Cohen’s d = 0.54).

also in 11,409 other papers

did not reach statistical significancep = 0.09so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
While the overall ANOVA did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.09) among the three attachment groups, pairwise analysis revealed a statistically significant difference between the oblique attachments and the vertical design ( p = 0.05), favoring the former.

also in 111,027 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.