showed a trendp = 0.007
Shammas Cooke showed a trend toward lower MAE in LenStar (p = 0.007), whereas the Haigis-L performance was comparable between devices (p = 0.715) ( Figure 1 ).
Shammas Cooke showed a trend toward lower MAE in LenStar (p = 0.007), whereas the Haigis-L performance was comparable between devices (p = 0.715) ( Figure 1 ).
Corneal keratometry (K1, K2, and mean K) was slightly steeper in Group 2, with borderline significance for K1 (38.06 ± 2.75 D vs 36.99 ± 2.88 D, p = 0.08) and mean K (38.47 ± 2.75 D vs 37.70 ± 2.83 D, p = 0.07).