borderline significancep = 0.099
SMPP analysis: Sample size emerged as the primary contributor ( p = 0.004, R2= 51.2%), while publication year showed borderline significance ( p = 0.099, R2= 19.7%).
SMPP analysis: Sample size emerged as the primary contributor ( p = 0.004, R2= 51.2%), while publication year showed borderline significance ( p = 0.099, R2= 19.7%).
Notably, although subgroup analysis indicated age as a relevant factor, the linear effect of age in meta-regression did not reach statistical significance, implying a more complex relationship between age and the predictive value of NLR.