highly significantP < 0.001
Analysis based on the intervention program revealed that for the resistance + aerobic exercise group, the results of the meta-analysis were highly significant (MD = 3.98; 95% CI: 1.89 to 6.06; I 2 = 98.0%; P < 0.001).
Analysis based on the intervention program revealed that for the resistance + aerobic exercise group, the results of the meta-analysis were highly significant (MD = 3.98; 95% CI: 1.89 to 6.06; I 2 = 98.0%; P < 0.001).
Upper limb joint mobility did not reach statistical significance (MD = −0.99), possibly because of the lack of multiplane movements of the shoulder joint or insufficient resistance load, suggesting the need for stronger task-oriented design.