marginally non-significantP = 0.071
Placebo) were observed at Weeks 26 (P = 0.016) and 52 (P = 0.041), as well as marginally non-significant differences at Weeks 13 (P = 0.071) and 39 (P = 0.064).
Placebo) were observed at Weeks 26 (P = 0.016) and 52 (P = 0.041), as well as marginally non-significant differences at Weeks 13 (P = 0.071) and 39 (P = 0.064).
Second, bivariate analyses were used to identify variables which were predictors of outcome based on a statistical trend defined as a P < 0.15.
A highly significant site effect, large between- and within-patient variation and poor fit of the data rendered the analyses produced from the First models inconclusive and a second modelling approach was implemented ( 22 ).
Moreover, there was a marginally significant overall treatment main effect and a significant slope difference in favour of tramiprosate according to the Final model analysis of the ADAS-cog scores.
Results Psychometric score results showed numerical trends in favour of tramiprosate that did not reach statistical significance.