showed a trendp = 0.057
Interaction between GROUP and GVS was not significant (p = 0.674), neither was GROUP × VS ( p = 0.75), the three-way interaction GROUP × GVS × VS showed a trend ( F (6, 312) = 2.06, p = 0.057, η 2 = 0.008, Fig. 5 B).
Interaction between GROUP and GVS was not significant (p = 0.674), neither was GROUP × VS ( p = 0.75), the three-way interaction GROUP × GVS × VS showed a trend ( F (6, 312) = 2.06, p = 0.057, η 2 = 0.008, Fig. 5 B).