a nonsignificant trendp = 0.263
8.1% in moderate ePWV and 7.4% in high ePWV, p = 0.020) and a nonsignificant trend toward higher diastolic dipper status (56.7% vs. 40.1% and 45.4%, respectively, p = 0.263) (Table 2 ). 3.4.
8.1% in moderate ePWV and 7.4% in high ePWV, p = 0.020) and a nonsignificant trend toward higher diastolic dipper status (56.7% vs. 40.1% and 45.4%, respectively, p = 0.263) (Table 2 ). 3.4.
Nevertheless, the low ePWV group (< 6 m/s) exhibited a distinct diastolic profile compared to the higher ePWV groups, characterized by significantly lower 24‐h, daytime, and night‐time DBP values and the greatest decline in nocturnal DBP, although the higher rate of diastolic dipper status in this group did not reach statistical significance.