Radial devices (k = 2) showed a larger point estimate (WMD −10.38) but with extreme heterogeneity (I 2 = 98.2%); the pooled estimate was imprecise and did not reach statistical significance (95% CI −21.33 to +0.57; p = 0.063).
← all excerpts
Optimizing the Use of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for CP/CPPS: A Modality-Based Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Focused and Radial Devices.
1
0.0630
0.0630