a numerical trendp = 0.11
HAZ was recorded with a numerical trend (beta 0.04, 95% CI −0.01–0.09, p = 0.11).
HAZ was recorded with a numerical trend (beta 0.04, 95% CI −0.01–0.09, p = 0.11).
The modest improvement in model fit when including HAZ suggests that sonographic interpretation based solely on “calendar age” may be suboptimal, though this association did not reach statistical significance.