an increasing trendp ≤ 0.001
In particular, the T0–T2 comparison was highly significant and showed an increasing trend ( p ≤ 0.001), while T0–T1 ( p = 0.063) and T1–T2 ( p = 0.072) showed trends toward significance, also in an increasing direction.
In particular, the T0–T2 comparison was highly significant and showed an increasing trend ( p ≤ 0.001), while T0–T1 ( p = 0.063) and T1–T2 ( p = 0.072) showed trends toward significance, also in an increasing direction.
The T0-T2 comparison was highly significant ( p ≤ 0.001), and T1-T2 also showed a significant difference ( p = 0.007), whereas T0-T1 did not reach significance ( p = 0.219).
All other comparisons did not reach statistical significance (all p > 0.05).
The comparison between Group 2 (HC-MCI-AD) and Group 3 (MCI-MCI-AD) showed a trend toward significance ( p = 0.056) but did not reach the conventional threshold.
The comparison between Group 2 (HC-MCI-AD) and Group 3 (MCI-MCI-AD) showed a trend towards significance ( p = 0.083) but did not exceed the conventional threshold.