Global and Local Deviance Effects in the Processing of Temporal Patterns.

Concerning the bias component (bias‐synch: R 2 marg = 0.006, R 2 cond = 0.83; bias‐cont: R 2 marg = 0.01, R 2 cond = 0.81), the ANOVA on the LME models’ estimates showed similar results (Figure S4A ): only a significant effect for the interaction between trial type and sequence type in the Continuation model (bias‐cont: F (1, 75) = 4.74, p = 0.033, η p 2 = 0.06), which did not reach statistical significance in the Synchronization model (bias‐synch: F (1, 75) = 3.59, p = 0.062, η p 2 = 0.04; all effects reported in Table S13 ).

also in 111,027 other papers

However, this effect appeared not to be consistent enough, as all pairwise comparison tests failed to reach significance (all contrasts and means reported in Tables S10 and S11 ).

also in 4,113 other papers