highly significantp < 0.01
The significance level was set at p < 0.05, and a highly significant level at p < 0.01.
The significance level was set at p < 0.05, and a highly significant level at p < 0.01.
163.58 ± 44.76 g, p < 0.05), but their influence on maximal strength indicators did not reach statistical significance. rs7975232 ( ApaI ): No statistically significant differences were found among the three genotypes (AA, AC, CC) for any of the tested indicators following the intervention (all p > 0.05), suggesting a limited impact of this polymorphism on the overall training response within the present cohort. 3.3.
235.01 ± 77.56 W, p = 0.046) was greater in the CT group though this difference should be interpreted with caution given its borderline significance. suggesting a potential advantage in baseline lower limb flexion strength for CT carriers.
In line with a conservative approach, p -values between 0.04 and 0.05 are interpreted as indicating a statistical trend. 3.