highly significantp = 1.6E-17
However, the simultaneous population was consistently lower than the pseudo-population, a difference that was highly significant (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p = 1.6E-17, Figure 5A ).
However, the simultaneous population was consistently lower than the pseudo-population, a difference that was highly significant (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p = 1.6E-17, Figure 5A ).
off-state comparison did not reach statistical significance (paired t test: t 378 = 0.67, p = 0.504 for on- vs. off-state comparison; t 378 = 0.93, p = 0.354 for on vs. mean rate comparison).