Barely Significant
← all excerpts

The Effects of Post-Activation Performance Enhancement on High Intensity Interval Training: A Comparison of Traditional and Cluster Set Protocols.

Eur J Sport Sci · 2026 · PMC12962404 · PMID 41785235

2
hedged sentences
0.0480
closest p · 1.0× alpha
0.0480
boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantp = 0.048actually significant
Peak Oxygen Uptake Between the HIIT Protocols and Maximal Oxygen Consumption Obtained From GXT Although the ANOVA indicated a marginally significant difference among conditions ( F (1.6,14.5) = 4.03; p = 0.048; η 2 p = 0.31), the pairwise post hoc comparisons did not reveal any statistically significant differences ( p = 0.123–0.566; Cohen's d = 0.50–0.88). 3.2.

also in 26,082 other papers

Although the main effect of condition did not reach statistical significance in the ANOVA, post hoc analysis revealed that the PAPE traditionalset elicited marginally but statistically higher [La max ] responses compared with the PAPE clusterset following the HIIT session ( p = 0.049, t = 2.94, Cohen's d = 0.93).

also in 111,027 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.