Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Methodological Considerations Regarding Heterogeneity and Statistical Modeling in "Effects on Exercise Tolerance and Functional Outcomes of Eccentric versus Concentric Aerobic Exercise in People with COPD" [Letter].

Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis · 2026 · PMC12990787 · PMID 41847334

2
hedged sentences
0.4300
closest p · 8.6× alpha
0.4300
boldest claim

The sentences

did not reach statistical significancep = 0.43not close (p > 0.1)
Additionally, we noted the frequent use of the term “improvements” when describing outcomes that did not reach statistical significance (eg, quadriceps strength, p = 0.43, or 6MWT, p = 0.12).

also in 111,027 other papers

highly significantno p-value reported
Applying a fixed-effect model under these conditions leads to “false precision,” where a result appears highly significant despite substantial inconsistency across studies. 3 To illustrate the potential impact of model choice, we contrasted the fixed-effect estimates reported by the authors with pooled effects re-estimated under random-effects assumptions (DerSimonian and Laird inverse-variance method) for each outcome using Review Manager (version 5.4, Cochrane Collaboration) software.

also in 132,142 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.