highly significantP < 0.001
The m-30s-CST difference was highly significant in those who improved on the SPPB versus the patients who worsened or remained stable on the SPPB (P < 0.001) ( Fig 2A and Table 2 ).
The m-30s-CST difference was highly significant in those who improved on the SPPB versus the patients who worsened or remained stable on the SPPB (P < 0.001) ( Fig 2A and Table 2 ).
The m-30s-CST showed a trend towards prediction of two-year mortality (AUC 0.609; P = 0,071) while HGS did not (AUC 0.573; P = 0.221).