Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Comparative effects of six rehabilitation therapies on lower limb function and gait function in stroke patients: a network meta-analysis of 33 RCTs.

Front Neurol · 2026 · PMC13002361 · PMID 41868484

Europe PMCDOI
1
hedged sentence
0.4400
closest p · 8.8× alpha
0.4400
boldest claim

The sentences

failed to reach statistical significanceP = 0.44not close (p > 0.1)
Compared with standardized rehabilitation (SR), aerobic rehabilitation (AR) showed no significant advantage [SMD = 0.47, 95% CI (−0.03, 0.98), P = 0.93], but with low study heterogeneity ( I 2 = 0%); Resistance training rehabilitation (RTR) also showed no significant difference [SMD = −0.05, 95% CI (−0.32, 0.22), P = 0.07], with moderate heterogeneity among studies ( I 2 = 58%); The effect of intelligent rehabilitation (IR) also failed to reach statistical significance [SMD = 0.29, 95% CI (−0.43, 1.01), P = 0.44]; Traditional Chinese medicine rehabilitation (TCR) showed no significant difference compared to SR [SMD = 0.08, 95% CI (−0.42, 0.59), P = 0.75].

also in 6,035 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.