highly significantp < 0.001
Group 3 demonstrated a significantly elevated risk (HR = 4.24, 95% CI: 1.20–15.0, p = 0.025), while Group 4 exhibited a markedly increased and highly significant risk (HR = 15.3, 95% CI: 4.99–47.0, p < 0.001).
Group 3 demonstrated a significantly elevated risk (HR = 4.24, 95% CI: 1.20–15.0, p = 0.025), while Group 4 exhibited a markedly increased and highly significant risk (HR = 15.3, 95% CI: 4.99–47.0, p < 0.001).
Although Group 2 showed a moderately elevated HR (HR = 2.97, 95% CI: 0.80–11.1), the association did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.105).
Interestingly, TG levels in our cohort appeared as a borderline significant predictor of mortality, with an HR close to one.