showed a trendp = 0.07
25.0%, p < 0.01), and those in cardiogenic shock showed a trend toward a lower rate of catheter ablation (28.6% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.07).
25.0%, p < 0.01), and those in cardiogenic shock showed a trend toward a lower rate of catheter ablation (28.6% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.07).