highly significantp < 0.001
reported a highly significant improvement in the Boston Naming Test (BNT, pre-treatment: 20.75 ± 4.49, post-treatment: 22.75 ± 4.28, p < 0.001) [ 41 ].
reported a highly significant improvement in the Boston Naming Test (BNT, pre-treatment: 20.75 ± 4.49, post-treatment: 22.75 ± 4.28, p < 0.001) [ 41 ].
However, it is important to note that in the studies by Monastero et al., Lang et al., and Trung et al., the between-groups comparisons did not reach statistical significance for any of the cognitive parameters assessed ( p > 0.05), indicating comparable effects between active and sham stimulation in these specific protocols [ 36 , 38 , 40 ]. 4.
report a positive trend (FAS, pre-treatment: 28.4 ± 12.0, post-treatment: 31.0 ± 12.5, p = 0.087) [ 34 , 37 , 39 ].