marginally significantp = 0.041
Begg’s test reported a marginally significant correlation (tau = −1.000; p = 0.041, uncorrected), which could indicate asymmetry in effect sizes.
Begg’s test reported a marginally significant correlation (tau = −1.000; p = 0.041, uncorrected), which could indicate asymmetry in effect sizes.
In contrast, the remaining trials did not reach statistical significance ( p > 0.05), suggesting that the interventions assessed in those studies did not substantially influence anxiety outcomes.
The publication bias analysis showed that, although the funnel plot exhibited a slight visual asymmetry, this pattern was not confirmed by statistical tests, which failed to reach significance.