Eliminating the Low-Prevalence Effect in Visual Search With a Remarkably Simple Strategy.

Psychol Sci · 2022 · PMC13038082 · PMID 35385335

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0580

closest p · 1.2× alpha

0.6700

boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantp = .058so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The interaction between search condition and target prevalence was marginally significant, F (1, 38) = 3.82, p = .058, η p 2 = .09, indicating that the LPE depended on search condition, although this interpretation should be made with caution (see Fig. 2 ).

also in 26,082 other papers

did not reach statistical significancep = .67not close (p > 0.1)

Results replicated Experiment 1, indicating that there was virtually no LPE in the similarity-search condition—1.6% difference in miss rates between the high-and low-prevalence conditions, which did not reach statistical significance, t (19) = 0.43, p = .67, α = .025.

also in 111,027 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.